<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Howard Owens - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-26724c79" type="application/json"/><link>http://howardowens.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://howardowens.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:39:47 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Lede&amp;#8217; vs. &amp;#8216;Lead&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2011/09/18/lede-vs-lead/#comment-930843603</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Everyone used the term lede in the late 50s and early 60s, when I worked at the Evening and Sunday Bulletin, Philadelphia, and in the late 60s, 70s and 80s as an editor for Intercounty Newspaper Group, and even into the mid 2000s, when I published The Phoenix, a daily newspaper in Phoenixville, PA.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wikipedia notes: "A lead, or lede, paragraph in literature refers to the opening paragraph of an article, essay, news story or book chapter. Often called just the lede/lead, it usually occurs together with the headline or title.&lt;br&gt; It precedes the main body of the article, and it gives the reader the &lt;br&gt;main idea of the story. Both spellings of the word are pronounced to &lt;br&gt;rhyme with "need".&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"In the journalism industry, particularly in the United States (see News style), the term is spelled "lede". The alternative spelling was invented to differentiate it from references to the metal lead (pronounced the same as "led"), which was used to cast type.[1] "Lede" refers to one or two sentences, not multiple paragraphs.&lt;br&gt; This spelling is absent from almost all print dictionaries, though it has recently started to appear in some online-edition US dictionaries such as &lt;a href="http://Merriam-Webster.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Merriam-Webster.com&lt;/a&gt; (it does not appear in any of their print versions, even unabridged) and &lt;a href="http://theFreeDictionary.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;theFreeDictionary.com&lt;/a&gt;; it is also listed in Wiktionary (and was chosen for the rest of this article).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"In journalism, the lede paragraph should not be confused with the standfirst (UK), &lt;br&gt;rider, kicker or subhead (US). These terms refer to an introductory or summary line or brief paragraph, located immediately above or below the headline, and typographically distinct from the body of the article."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fred Donaldson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:39:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Migrating from Drupal to WordPress</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2011/08/23/migrating-from-drupal-to-wordpress/#comment-924932316</link><description>&lt;p&gt;best option to use migration tool to export Drupal to WordPress&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wordpress Arena</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 05:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My evolution as a photographer and thoughts on the Chicago Sun-Times</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2013/06/07/my-evolution-as-a-photographer-and-thoughts-on-the-chicago-sun-times/#comment-924374986</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The interest in video seems to be driven by the higher rates some news organizations can charge, above the digital dimes. That aside, I think it's notable that you weren't a staff photographer when you the boss gave your reporter self a camera and said go take pictures. You wanted to keep getting better and believed in what you were doing. There are likely to be reporters who take to it the same way. Have I described you accurately?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I've put some effort into seeing how well iPhones can cover the news. The iPhone is best at being "the camera you have with you." It's also good at uploading quickly, at least these days. Other things take some planning and are a challenge: Zoom, tripod, lighting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian Cubbison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 11:48:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My evolution as a photographer and thoughts on the Chicago Sun-Times</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2013/06/07/my-evolution-as-a-photographer-and-thoughts-on-the-chicago-sun-times/#comment-923213329</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have a 35mm 1.8 prime and a 55mm 1.4 prime and an 18mm 3.5 prime (came with a film camera in a box I bought at an auction).  Yes, primes have superior image quality, especially over the consumer-grade zooms, but my 70-200mm is pretty awesome. For photojournalism work, zooms provide more flexibility.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Howard Owens</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 08:06:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My evolution as a photographer and thoughts on the Chicago Sun-Times</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2013/06/07/my-evolution-as-a-photographer-and-thoughts-on-the-chicago-sun-times/#comment-922419911</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'll have to look into the magic trio. I hadn't heard of it before.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I definitely want to spend money on glass before I upgrade my D40 body (I use a D3200 at work). I mostly shoot the Nikon 35mm 1.8 prime, which I really like. I prefer primes for their light weight and sharpness. I also want to get the 85mm 1.8 prime. But that leaves me with a big hole at the wide angle side of things, as the DX bodies make the 35mm into a 53mm. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Do you have the 14-24mm? I'd be very interested in that. If I one day do more sports shooting again, I'd definitely look long and hard at the 70-200mm.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:26:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My evolution as a photographer and thoughts on the Chicago Sun-Times</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2013/06/07/my-evolution-as-a-photographer-and-thoughts-on-the-chicago-sun-times/#comment-922316217</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Patrick.  I doubled down on the 7000 when the 7100 came out because outside of the larger sensor, there wasn't much difference for the price.  File size is important to me because I take so many photos and need to work quickly, so I saved a few bucks on the smaller sensor (which is still I think is a very fine sensor).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The 70-200mm is part of Nikon's magic trio.  I wish I had all three lenses.  &lt;a href="http://www.nikonguides.com/triolens.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.nikonguides.com/tri...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It's definitely worth the money to buy professional grade glass if you can afford it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Howard Owens</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:37:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My evolution as a photographer and thoughts on the Chicago Sun-Times</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2013/06/07/my-evolution-as-a-photographer-and-thoughts-on-the-chicago-sun-times/#comment-922308465</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Every knowledgeable newspaper staffer I've known who's shared facts about video use and demand at their paper has said stills consistently outperform video online. Video shouldn't be ignored for sure, and it's a visual journalism skill set all photojournalists should adopt, but I don't see still photography going away anytime soon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Billy Suratt</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:28:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My evolution as a photographer and thoughts on the Chicago Sun-Times</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2013/06/07/my-evolution-as-a-photographer-and-thoughts-on-the-chicago-sun-times/#comment-922270585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well said Howard.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Part of what makes photography so powerful for news organizations, particularly good photography, is that people like to look at and share photos, even if the event or what is in them doesn't mean much to them. I find many of the photos you take for The Batavian interesting, even though I live in DC. That would never be true with video.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is even more true today with social media. People love to share photos, and the Facebook algorithm in particular weights photos above everything else. Sharing photography is a good way to get new fans for a local site such as yours, something that I don't think video would do quite as well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;People like video too, but I find that people tend to like news video that directly impacts or interests them. People are less likely to watch video for the sake of looking at something interesting like they are with photos. Good news video also takes a lot of planning and editing, and I think a lot of people have gotten used to seeing poor news video on the Web and are turned off by it. Broadcast outlets produce strong videos and podcasts for the Web, but many newspapers have produced low-production quality audio and video that is much weaker than their own photography.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is definitely a place for writing, photos, video, data and more for news organizations. I strongly disagree, however, with the Sun-Times decision to throw photography out the window to do more Web video.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For what it's worth, I think you've become a very strong photographer in the last few years. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm thinking of getting a D7000 or D7100 myself. What other lenses do you use besides the 70-200mm?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Patrick Thornton</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 10:58:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My evolution as a photographer and thoughts on the Chicago Sun-Times</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2013/06/07/my-evolution-as-a-photographer-and-thoughts-on-the-chicago-sun-times/#comment-922188720</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You often see articles that say video is the next big thing for the web. That people will demand video. I don't see it. Our experience at &lt;a href="http://westofthei.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;westofthei.com&lt;/a&gt; is similar to Howard's as far as stills versus video. I have not advanced my photography as far as Howard has, but we use much less video. I still capture some things on video that scream for it. Bands in parades. Tractor pulls at the county fair. Bagpipes and Taps at a law enforcement memorial ceremony. But there has to be a compelling action/sound reason for us to run video now. We largely don't cover an event strictly with an edited video of any length. We typically run pretty raw video to allow someone to experience something such as the above examples. As to the S-T, any move that is so lacking in nuance is probably ill-advised. In the modern big time newsroom do photographers need to contribute in ways beyond just capturing images? Yes. I just covered an event where the local daily newspaper (my former employer) also covered with a photographer and reporter. The reporter was arriving later. The photographer told the event organizer "I don't do quotes," when the organizer tried to pass on some info. And this is at a paper much smaller than the S-t. That kind of thing just isn't acceptable anymore.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Darren Hillock</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:31:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Lede&amp;#8217; vs. &amp;#8216;Lead&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2011/09/18/lede-vs-lead/#comment-911224333</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You seem to be conservative.Don't you want new word inventions? But you are quick to embrace technological inventions! Languages are not static,they keep on growing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KIGOZI ALEX</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 11:56:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I&amp;#8217;m rooting for Vance Albitz</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2011/09/05/why-im-rooting-for-vance-albitz/#comment-895527962</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've become a Vance Albitz fan as well.  Last night, in a 20 inning game in Springfield (AA), he pitched three scoreless innings, including a pair of strikeouts.  If that wasn't enough, he somehow got to Memphis (AAA) the following morning and played in an afternoon game there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I am totally with you - rooting for the guys that play beyond their statistical measures.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bob Netherton</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 22:17:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Lede&amp;#8217; vs. &amp;#8216;Lead&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2011/09/18/lede-vs-lead/#comment-891614360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As a retired English Instructor, I am only grateful that this year is the first I've seen of the word (?) "lede".  Ha!  My spell-checker just kicked it out!  lmao!  It would merely have added to my and my students' frustration with the homophone clusters, your/you're, they're/there/their, and so on.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seagazer101</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 23:16:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: IFRA launches second vertical search engine for media</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2008/03/20/ifra-launches-second-vertical-search-engine-media/#comment-867228132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good post. You better try the new &lt;a href="www.searchblox.com" rel="nofollow"&gt; vertical search &lt;/a&gt; and made a blog entry about it so that we will know.  Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pamela Lagahid</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:38:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My new Nikon F4</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2011/11/20/my-new-nikon-f4/#comment-858819525</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool shots, have fun with the Fs!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kapiyo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 13:08:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chris Tolles brings some stats to the anonymous vs. registration debate</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2008/01/09/chris-tolles-brings-some-stats-anonymous-vs-registration-debate/#comment-852124612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This proved to be ridiculous. What it amounts to is Topix is a bullying site. The reason they don't have registration (and most other sites do) is lack of confidence in their users. The fact is this article came out in 2008 when they were averaging without registration around 150,000 comments a day which may sound good but they had at time probably 350,000 forums so if you think about it, that isn't that impressive. Five years later, Topix claims they are getting millions of hits, etc. That may or may not be true but let's examine the number of comments they are getting still WITHOUT REGISTRATION. They are averaging around 150,000 a day five years later. Think about that.&lt;br&gt;With this says is the lack of registration is a problem. Those that are posting are the people who go on Topix post lies about other people and attack Topix users. They are the cowards who hide behind computers with the intent to harm other people and the comments have not grown. They haven't grown at all. This means that those who go on Topix thinking it is a news site, may post a few times and then they are quickly ran off because of the trash allowed on that website only leaving the internet trolls. Topix doesn't want to go to user registration because they fear even minor accountability will run off their auidence. Doesn't say much for the product, does it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bradleyplunk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:29:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Lede&amp;#8217; vs. &amp;#8216;Lead&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2011/09/18/lede-vs-lead/#comment-849505349</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Because he clearly took it seriously for a while.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Evelyn Stice</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 09:33:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: &amp;#8216;Lede&amp;#8217; vs. &amp;#8216;Lead&amp;#8217;</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2011/09/18/lede-vs-lead/#comment-845424611</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If the writer can't remember who told him to use 'lede', how can he say it was someone he "obviously respected"?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">hetero habilis</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 18:08:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Suggested RSS feeds</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2008/01/16/suggested-rss-feeds/#comment-834570029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I stumble across this post 5 years later and can't get to the Back Channel link.&lt;br&gt;Should've posted in both places, here and there!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anona Mous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 07:50:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Personal Journalism</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2007/01/23/personal-journalism/#comment-813091842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for bring up this topic.  Many great writers -- Jimmy Breslin, Tom Wolfe, Nat Hentoff, etc. -- engaged in "personal journalism" in the 1960s and beyond.  Their writings then are still a thrill to read today.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jamie Jobb</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:21:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to launch your own local news site in 10 (not so easy) steps</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2011/09/27/how-to-launch-your-own-local-news-site-in-10-not-so-easy-steps/#comment-798131453</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Stephen, Where are you planning on opening?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MM</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:06:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to launch your own local news site in 10 (not so easy) steps</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2011/09/27/how-to-launch-your-own-local-news-site-in-10-not-so-easy-steps/#comment-780855001</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent, unvarnished how-to guide. I just came across this because I'm looking into doing the same thing in my community, and I think you've nailed it, Howard. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Davies</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:54:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A collection of YouTube sales training videos for aspiring local online news publishers</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2012/09/20/a-collection-of-youtube-sales-training-videos-for-aspiring-local-online-news-publishers/#comment-775500963</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You tube is one of the best source where you can get so many kind of training videos. I think it is is very much helpful for people to learn anything easily.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">errostjessica</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:27:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s time to move legal notices online</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2012/05/14/its-time-to-move-legal-notices-online/#comment-775499879</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is such a nice information about this post which is based on legal notice. I think this post is really helps to people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">errostjessica</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:23:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You&amp;#8217;re not in the railroad business, you&amp;#8217;re in the news business</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2012/08/19/youre-not-in-the-railroad-business-youre-in-the-news-business/#comment-775499043</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really agree with this post which is such a beneficial to people to know about newspaper. You should be delivered as per the customers requirement.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">errostjessica</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:21:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Photos: San Francisco</title><link>http://howardowens.com/2012/09/24/photos-san-francisco/#comment-775497305</link><description>&lt;p&gt;San Francisco is one of the best place in the world. These above photos are really very beautiful and looking pretty.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">errostjessica</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 05:16:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>